Hajra Naz
Google has quietly updated its artificial intelligence (AI) principles, removing prior commitments not to use AI for weapons or surveillance. The revision, made public on Tuesday, eliminates language that had previously assured the company would not develop AI technologies for harmful military applications or invasive monitoring.
A Shift in AI Ethics
The upgrade comes just weeks after Google CEO Sundar Pichai and other driving tech executives went to the inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump. The timing suggests a potential shift in Google’s stance toward AI ethics, particularly in light of changing political leadership and regulatory approaches.
When questioned about the policy change, a Google spokesperson directed inquiries to a blog post outlining the company’s revised AI principles. Notably, the new principles omit any reference to the promises Pichai originally outlined in 2018. Instead, the post—authored by Google DeepMind chief Demis Hassabis and Research Labs Senior Vice President James Manyika—emphasizes AI’s role in supporting democracy, human rights, and national security.
“We believe democracies should lead in AI development, guided by core values like freedom, equality, and respect for human rights,” the blog states.
“And we believe that companies, governments, and organizations sharing these values should work together to create AI that protects people, promotes global growth, and supports national security.”
Read More: Google Alerts All Android Users—Your Phone Is Now At Risk
Vanishing Commitments
Pichai’s original 2018 statement had explicitly committed Google to avoiding AI applications in weapons designed to harm people or surveillance that violates internationally accepted norms. The removal of this language marks a notable departure from Google’s previous stance on ethical AI use.
This policy change aligns with broader administrative shifts under the Trump administration. Upon taking office, Trump quickly cancelled an official order by his predecessor, Joe Biden, which had mandated AI security conventions. The order required AI developers to report potential dangers posed by their innovation, especially those with suggestions for national security, the economy, or open security.
With fewer restrictions, U.S. tech companies are now operating with increased autonomy in the AI space. Google, for its part, maintains that it remains transparent in its AI efforts. The company pointed to its annual AI report as evidence of its continued commitment to ethical AI development.
Geopolitical and Industry Implications
The revised AI principles come at a time when AI competition is intensifying on a global scale.
“There’s a global competition taking place for AI leadership within an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape,”
Hassabis and Manyika stated in their blog post.
“Billions of people are using AI in their everyday lives.”
The move is particularly significant given Google’s past ethical controversies. The unique AI standards were presented in response to employee protests over Google’s inclusion in Project Maven, a Pentagon activity utilizing AI to upgrade military focusing on capabilities. Google eventually pulled back from the extend, citing moral concerns and inner restrictions.
However, the removal of explicit restrictions on AI weaponization and surveillance raises fresh questions about the company’s future role in military and government AI initiatives. Critics argue that without firm commitments, Google could once again become entangled in controversial AI applications.
Read More: Google Search Becomes an AI Assistant in 2025, Says Sundar Pichai
What’s Next for Google’s AI Strategy?
The public and regulators will probably be watching Google’s changing position closely as AI gets more integrated into defence, security, and geopolitical plans. Increased military and governmental cooperation is possible since the updated AI principles lack defined ethical limitations.
As of right moment, Google maintains that its actions are in the best interests of world stability and democratic values. However, those who are worried about the ethical ramifications of artificial intelligence may become even more sceptical of the company’s future AI initiatives in the absence of the clear promises made in the past.
